In a stunning development, Andrew Symonds has exclusively revealed to this blog that he is pulling out from the Indian Premier League. The news comes a couple of days after Cricket Australia announced that he would not be considered for national selection until he completed his counselling & rehabilitation. He said that his decision was not related to any on-field related issue with Deccan Chargers.
Having looked at the various teams in the Indian Premier League, Symonds came to the conclusion that it would be impossible for him to resist the temptation to go fishing in the cities where the IPL games were played in. Delhi & Kolkota have rivers, Chennai & Mumbai have beaches while all the others (Bangalore, Hyderabad, Jaipur & Mohali) had lakes (artificial & natural).
I guess we'll have to await confirmation from the ECB, but this is about the worst thing that England cricket needs now with a tour of West Indies starting in a couple of weeks and a team that hasn't beaten significant opposition for 3 years now, the last one being the home win over Pakistan in 2006.
Now who'll be made captain? Strauss? But he isn't in the ODI team. Vaughan? Isn't that a retrograde move? Flintoff? He was cast aside after the 2006/07 Ashes thrashing. Collingwood? He gave up the job 5 months ago and I'm not sure how much of a certainty he is in tests because he seems to be in the team on a per-test basis. Cook? Far too early! My guess is that the ECB, if it does accept Pietersen's resignation, will opt for Strauss as test captain & persuade Flintoff or Collingwood to be the ODI captain.
As for the coach, that's a toughie because the main candidates that people have talked about are associated with either Pietersen or Moores. Andy Flower is a Moores pick while Graham Ford was being backed by Pietersen. I guess that also rules out Warne!
Do I love it when England cricket is in trouble? Of course!
Update: I just had a rather evil thought. Does it seem like Pietersen doesn't quite enjoy it when things don't work out the way he wants? He quit South Africa claiming that the system was unfair. Now he's quit as captain because he can't have his way with the coach.
News trickling in just now - Sourav Ganguly has announced his retirement. He will be quitting after the test series against Australia.
It is unclear if he will be retiring from all forms of cricket, including book cricket. Remember, he captained the Kolkata Knight Riders in the IPL last year. Will he play in the 2009 edition?
The retirement, in my opinion, is poorly timed. The announcement means that he will definitely be picked for all four tests. It puts immense pressure on him, and the team. Just think back to Steve Waugh's farewell series against India in 2003/04. I'm fairly sure that Waugh's decision to announce his retirement before the series definitely impacted Australia's performances.
The other reason it is poorly timed is that it basically ensures that the likes of Kaif, Badrinath, Raina or Yuvraj have no hope of playing the series, barring injury affecting the rest of the middle-order.
A few weeks after announcing that England would have separate captains for tests and one-dayers, the ECB is apparently seriously considering the idea of having two teams represent the country in international cricket. Sources close to the ECB management told this writer that the decision has almost been taken.
Marlon Samuels was specifically identified by Nagpur's Deputy Commissioner of Police as having leaked match related information (pitch conditions, team information and batting order) to a bookie named Mukesh Kochchar. There is as yet no mention if any money exchanged hands or indeed if Marlon Samuels was also paid to under-perform.
Section C of the ICC Code of Conduct for Players & Officials explicitly deals with interacting with bookmakers, betting, etc. Even if Samuels didn't accept any money/gift etc., he could be charged with having dealt with bookmakers under Clause 4 (xi) of the code. That is, if he hadn't brought his interaction to the notice of his captain, manager, senior board official or ACU official. He could be fined and banned for anything between 1 and 5 years if he is found guilty. In fact, if he did bring it to the notice of the above folks, they would be charged and get a similar ban & penalty if found guilty, but would Samuels get away with it?
It is perhaps worth noting that I'd nominated him for the 'Man of the match' award for his invaluable knock of 40 in 60 balls when West Indies needed 7 an over to win. Coincidence? Hmmm ...
All that the BCCI has asked for is that Cricket Australia allow SK Bansal and AV Jayaprakash to stand in as umpires when Australia next tours India for tests. As a bonus, Cricket Australia have agreed to the BCCI's proposal that Darrell Hair would appear in commercials to promote the SG brand of balls, the manufacturers of which are faced with the distinict possibility of going out of business.
Sources in to Cricket Australia confirmed to this correspondent that since Australia had anyway won in India after 35 years in 2004, they weren't overly concerned about the potential home team bias involved in the BCCI's proposal. "What's yet another series win in India compared to winning back the Ashes, mate?", the source remarked snobbishly.
Breaking news In news just coming out of Sri Lanka, discarded ex-skipper and opener Sanath Jayasuriya has just destroyed his television set by throwing his remote control on it.
While it is as yet unknown about whether it was pent up anger at his exclusion which forced him to do so, sources close to him inform us that he did so because he was livid at Sri Lanka's collapse from 109/1 to 123/5 on the fourth day of the Delhi test against India.
One of his friends, who wishes to remain unnamed, told this correspondent that he heard Sanath scream "I can bat better with the remote control than these buggers can do with the bat!". He also added that while that was just an approximate translation, there was a liberal dose of choice expletives in Sinhalese hurled at the players who got out, the Sri Lankan cricket board, the selectors and the team management.
Sri Lanka require 313 more runs to win with five wickets in hand and one day remaining.
Links within entries open in a new window. Some of the links may now be broken/not take you to the expected report since the original
content providers may have archived/removed the contents. Some of the sites linked may require registration/subscription.
All opinions expressed are those of the authors alone. The authors' respective employers (past, present or future) are in no way connected to the opinions
expressed here.
All pictures, photographs used are copyrights of the original owners. We do not intend to infringe on any copyright. Pictures and photographs are used here to merely accentuate and enhance the content value to our readers.