ICC and PCB - The 'unfathomables'

The ICC announced last week that the Cricket Committee recommended the DRS be used in all test series as well as the 2011 World Cup.

Yet again, the ICC will be conducting an experiment in their flagship event. Before the 2006 Champions Trophy in India, the ICC announced that reviews would be introduced at the tournament and, if successful, would be in force during the 2007 World Cup.

Thankfully, sanity prevailed a couple of months later, and the executive board threw that idea out of the window.

The DRS has so far, to the best of my knowledge, never been used in limited over internationals (50 overs or 20 overs). Without trialling it in bilateral series or other 3-4 nation tournaments, it would be downright stupid to use a World Cup to introduce the reviews system.

We still don't know how much time would be spent in a typical 50 over game on both teams appealing against the umpires' decisions. Wouldn't that result in the game being stretched beyond the normal 3 hr 30 mins / 3 hr 45 mins duration?

The ICC wants the broadcaster to shell out the money for the technology used. Maybe the right way to 'sell' the concept to the broadcaster is that they would have at least 10 minutes more per innings of telecast time, and thus something like 30-40 more advertisement slots.

The ICC's argument is that poorer (associate & affiliate) countries that don't benefit from the DRS shouldn't have to subsidize countries that will play games using the reviews system. The broadcaster's counter-argument should be that they don't want to pay up for a system that is unproven, and could potentially work against their favourite team.

Imagine if ESPN-Star, Sky Sports or the Nine Network paid up for the DRS, and the decisions kept going against India, England or Australia. For sure the broadcaster, and the audiences, would hate it!

From all evidence so far though, there is a lot more fine-tuning needed with the DRS, and I humbly submit that the World Cup is not the stage for a trial.

On 9 March, the PCB banned 4 players (2 indefinite, 2 for 1 year) and fined 3 others, who were placed under probation for 6 months.

Less than 3 months later, 2 of those banned and all the 3 who were fined are in a probables list for the Asia Cup and a tour of England. The 16 year-old ball-muncher is made captain.

I apologize. I totally give up trying to make sense out of the ICC's and the PCB's actions.

Labels: 2011 world cup, afridi, ban, icc, pakistan, reviews, selection

Thus spake Jagadish @ 1:29 am | Sledge/Read 2 sledge(s)
Did you like the post? [ Subscribe to the blog feed - | | Tweet ]

Shahid Afridi all set to cop it

After Herschelle Gibbs last month, it is now Shahid Afridi's turn to incur the wrath of ICC Chief Executive Malcolm Speed.

Shahid Afridi was not reported by the umpires after he waved his bat angrily at a spectator after being dismissed in the opening one-day game at Centurion. The ICC said that it couldn't do a thing since no one had complained. Speed then acted as befitted his name.

Afridi is now charged with committing a Level 3 offence, which could result in him being banned for 2-4 tests or 4-8 one-dayers if found guilty.

Given that Pakistan have 3 more one-dayers to go before the World Cup begins, my guess is that the ICC will not hit Pakistan hard. The ICC obviously won't admit it, but it will remember how Pakistan made a mockery of the game at the Oval and the danger that such a thing could recur.

What's going to happen is that Afridi will get a 4 ODI ban. Pakistan will appeal, and even if the ban is be reduced to 2 ODIs, it would still would mean that he won't play in the tournament opener, against the hosts. That is, assuming the PCB doesn't hastily arrange for a warm-up series against Bangladesh or Zimbabwe. The other compromise could be Afridi being banned for a few tests, which Pakistan wouldn't mind at all, hoping that they could cross the bridge when they got to it.

Labels: 2007 world cup, afridi, ball tampering, gibbs, icc, pakistan, south africa, world cup

Thus spake Jagadish @ 10:55 pm | Sledge/Read 5 sledge(s)
Did you like the post? [ Subscribe to the blog feed - | | Tweet ]