Cricket 24x7 - All the cricket

Breaking/Brief news

    May 27, 2010

    ICC and PCB - The 'unfathomables'

    The ICC announced last week that the Cricket Committee recommended the DRS be used in all test series as well as the 2011 World Cup.

    Yet again, the ICC will be conducting an experiment in their flagship event. Before the 2006 Champions Trophy in India, the ICC announced that reviews would be introduced at the tournament and, if successful, would be in force during the 2007 World Cup.

    Thankfully, sanity prevailed a couple of months later, and the executive board threw that idea out of the window.

    The DRS has so far, to the best of my knowledge, never been used in limited over internationals (50 overs or 20 overs). Without trialling it in bilateral series or other 3-4 nation tournaments, it would be downright stupid to use a World Cup to introduce the reviews system.

    We still don't know how much time would be spent in a typical 50 over game on both teams appealing against the umpires' decisions. Wouldn't that result in the game being stretched beyond the normal 3 hr 30 mins / 3 hr 45 mins duration?

    The ICC wants the broadcaster to shell out the money for the technology used. Maybe the right way to 'sell' the concept to the broadcaster is that they would have at least 10 minutes more per innings of telecast time, and thus something like 30-40 more advertisement slots.

    The ICC's argument is that poorer (associate & affiliate) countries that don't benefit from the DRS shouldn't have to subsidize countries that will play games using the reviews system. The broadcaster's counter-argument should be that they don't want to pay up for a system that is unproven, and could potentially work against their favourite team.

    Imagine if ESPN-Star, Sky Sports or the Nine Network paid up for the DRS, and the decisions kept going against India, England or Australia. For sure the broadcaster, and the audiences, would hate it!

    From all evidence so far though, there is a lot more fine-tuning needed with the DRS, and I humbly submit that the World Cup is not the stage for a trial.

    On 9 March, the PCB banned 4 players (2 indefinite, 2 for 1 year) and fined 3 others, who were placed under probation for 6 months.

    Less than 3 months later, 2 of those banned and all the 3 who were fined are in a probables list for the Asia Cup and a tour of England. The 16 year-old ball-muncher is made captain.

    I apologize. I totally give up trying to make sense out of the ICC's and the PCB's actions.

    Labels: , , , , , ,


    Thus spake Jagadish @ 1:29 AM |
    Did you like the post? [ Subscribe to the blog feed - Blog Feed | | ]

    2 sledge(s):

    Somewhat I agree what you said about PCB as I must agree they have been labled as U-Turners in Pakistan by Media and Commoners. Just imagine they had fined some players by banning them and again you are recalling them for upcoming Asia Cup and Home Series in England. I just wanna ask why didn't they scruitinize management which is more responsible for all this fiasco? Even if the parents have low control on their child, child would literally exploit them, whats different now between PCB and its players?

    By Anonymous Murtaza Moiz (27-May-2010, 1:27:00 PM)  

    PCB should be BAN....

    By Anonymous Betting (28-May-2010, 5:49:00 PM)  


    We'd prefer if you posted comments with your real name to add more credibility to your opinions. However, the moderators reserve the right to delete comments, especially those containing offensive or unsuitable language. The opinions in the comments are your own views. You are welcome to provide a URL to your own cricket blog, but the moderators reserve the right to delete comments which only reference sites for viewing live streams.

    Post a Comment

    Links to ICC and PCB - The 'unfathomables'

    Technorati

    Bloglines

    Blogger search:

    Create a Link


    Links within entries open in a new window. Some of the links may now be broken/not take you to the expected report since the original content providers may have archived/removed the contents. Some of the sites linked may require registration/subscription.
    All opinions expressed are those of the authors alone. The authors' respective employers (past, present or future) are in no way connected to the opinions expressed here.
    All pictures, photographs used are copyrights of the original owners. We do not intend to infringe on any copyright. Pictures and photographs are used here to merely accentuate and enhance the content value to our readers.

    Powered by Blogger Locations of visitors to this page
    HOME
    RSS Feed - RSS Feed


    Contact us
    cricket24x7 at gmail dot com
    cricket24x7 at yahoo dot com

    How Cricket 24x7 started


    The squad
    Wanted for Indian cricket: Consistency of selectio...
    More India v Australia coming up?
    Players v/s owners at the IPL
    What is the point of this exercise, BCCI?
    Johnson Cherian, Lalit Modi and a couple of domain...
    A strong link between the IPL and the T20 World Cu...
    Choking at the IPL
    IPL 2010 semi-final prediction
    Last hurrah for quite a few players at the 2010 IP...
    Mitchell Johnson is the new Harry Houdini



    RHS navbar photo source - Tc7

    Partnership between


    Creative Commons License
    Cricket 24x7 - All the cricket by V Ganesh & S Jagadish is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License.