Cricket 24x7 - All the cricket

Breaking/Brief news

    March 09, 2010

    Mitchell Johnson is the new Harry Houdini

    In December 2009, Sulieman Benn, Brad Haddin and Mitchell Johnson were involved in a downright ugly altercation at the WACA test. Johnson wasn't really the trouble-maker then, but less than three months later, during the Napier ODI against New Zealand, he was the instigator.

    After being smacked for consecutive boundaries by Scott Styris in the last two balls of his 10-over quota (46th over of the innings), Johnson totally lost it.

    He screamed at Styris and definitely head-butted him (see video #1 and video #2).

    There were only two reasons why the situation didn't get worse - Styris was wearing a helmet, and Brad Haddin pushed Johnson away from the scene.

    Again, as was the case at Perth, the umpire did nothing!

    After the game, Ranjan Madugalle, the match referee had a man-to-man talk with Mitchell Johnson and Scott Styris and fined them 60% and 15% of their match fee.

    Johnson was charged with a level 2 offence (2.2.4 dealing with inappropriate and deliberate physical contact). Styris was charged with a level 1 offence (2.1.8 dealing with actions contrary to the spirit of cricket, bringing the game into disrepute).

    So let's go back in time. In December, Johnson brought the game into disrepute and his actions were contrary to the spirit of the game. At that same time, Sulieman Benn was given suspension points and missed two ODIs.

    Yet, while Benn got suspension points, the ICC media release makes no mention of Johnson getting suspension points. I'm definitely not making the case that Benn got a harsh punishment. But the point here is around how somehow the ICC match referees tend to close at least one eye when it comes to judging Australian players' behaviour.

    One suspension point means the player misses an ODI or T20 international. Two suspension points means the player misses a test or two ODIs/T20 internationals.

    Clause 7.3 of the code of conduct deals with repeat offences within a 12 month (not calendar year) period. A repeat of a level 1 offence results in a fine between 50-100% of the match fee and/or 2 suspension points. A repeat of a level 2 offence results in between 2 and 8 suspension points.

    In December, Johnson was hauled up under a level 1 offence charge. Last week, he was hauled up under a level 2 offence. But in both situations, his act was the same - inappropriate physical contact. Given the recurrence, it seems fairly obvious that he should have been suspended for at least 1 ODI, in addition to a monetary penalty.

    Since he pleaded guilty early on, thereby escaping the match referee's wrath (?), I hereby anoint Mitchell Johnson the new Harry Houdini.

    What's your opinion?

    How did Mitchell Johnson get away without being banned for at least 1 ODI?
    He knows Ranjan Madugalle's dark secrets and is blackmailing him
    There was serious plea bargaining
    Ricky Ponting demanded that Madugalle take his word that Johnson was not guilty of anything
    Mitchell Johnson is the new Harry Houdini
    He's Aussie

    Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

    Thus spake Jagadish @ 12:07 AM |
    Did you like the post? [ Subscribe to the blog feed - Blog Feed | | ]

    3 sledge(s):

    It's a tradition now in these days. White man's are always free with these types of things. Only subcontinental players are fined. This Khel should be changed.

    By Anonymous John (13-Mar-2010, 6:18:00 PM)  

    I have been visiting various blogs for my term papers writing research. I have found your blog to be quite useful. Keep updating your blog with valuable information... Regards

    By Anonymous Term Papers (13-May-2010, 2:34:00 PM)  

    Your blog is really helps for my search and i really like it.. Thanks a lot..:)
    Term Papers Writing Services

    By Anonymous Anonymous (02-Dec-2010, 9:19:00 PM)  

    We'd prefer if you posted comments with your real name to add more credibility to your opinions. However, the moderators reserve the right to delete comments, especially those containing offensive or unsuitable language. The opinions in the comments are your own views. You are welcome to provide a URL to your own cricket blog, but the moderators reserve the right to delete comments which only reference sites for viewing live streams.

    Post a Comment

    Links to Mitchell Johnson is the new Harry Houdini



    Blogger search:

    Create a Link

    Links within entries open in a new window. Some of the links may now be broken/not take you to the expected report since the original content providers may have archived/removed the contents. Some of the sites linked may require registration/subscription.
    All opinions expressed are those of the authors alone. The authors' respective employers (past, present or future) are in no way connected to the opinions expressed here.
    All pictures, photographs used are copyrights of the original owners. We do not intend to infringe on any copyright. Pictures and photographs are used here to merely accentuate and enhance the content value to our readers.

    Powered by Blogger Locations of visitors to this page
    RSS Feed - RSS Feed

    Contact us
    cricket24x7 at gmail dot com
    cricket24x7 at yahoo dot com

    How Cricket 24x7 started

    The squad
    Brett Lee retires, BCCI asks for a rule change
    Sloth Sehwag and it is time to ban football in cri...
    Bangladesh are indeed ordinary
    Mahela: Kotla wasn't a fair wicket for one-day cri...
    What were the umpires doing at Perth?
    Re-structuring the ICC Future Tours Programme
    Athers and Kapil are only partly right
    Twenty years of Tendulkar
    Harbhajan is shaping up as an extra batsman
    Packed calendar, or taking audiences and spectator...

    RHS navbar photo source - Tc7

    Partnership between

    Creative Commons License
    Cricket 24x7 - All the cricket by V Ganesh & S Jagadish is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License.