Cricket 24x7 - All the cricket

Breaking/Brief news

    November 30, 2006

    Adelaide was no freak show, Andrew

    Andrew Miller writes in his preview of tomorrow's Ashes test at Adelaide
    It's little wonder Australia are so upbeat. They have just swapped one stronghold at the Gabba for another at Adelaide - a ground where they have won nine of their last 11 Tests, dating back to England's win in the 1994-95 series. In that time there has been just one draw and one freakishly high-scoring defeat, against the Indians in 2003-04.
    Freakish? India's win at Adelaide was freakish?

    What's Andrew rambling about? India competed with Australia in every single game of the series, well most of every single game at least! Yes, Australia were without Warne and McGrath. Yes, Australia were clearly overwhelmed by Steve Waugh's farewell to cricket. But Warne was never going to be a factor. McGrath's absence did hurt. It hurts Australia last year, at Edgbaston and Trent Bridge. It could hurt them at Adelaide.

    So, would I call England's wins at Edgbaston and Trent Bridge, and indeed the Ashes win, freakish? Certainly not. Unfortunate? Yes.

    Labels: ,


    Thus spake Jagadish @ 12:24 pm |
    Did you like the post? [ Subscribe to the blog feed - Blog Feed | | ]

    3 sledge(s):

    What? He clearly said it was freakishly high-scoring, not that the win was freakish. Given that both sides passed 500 first up, I don't think that's an unreasonable comment.

    By Blogger Geoff (30 Nov 2006, 7:36:00 pm)  

    No. This is what he said "freakishly high-scoring defeat". I felt that 'freak' didn't do justice to India's efforts in the game. Remember, that after making 500+, Australia didn't even get 200 in their second innings. I suppose that was freakish too.

    By Blogger Jagadish (30 Nov 2006, 9:10:00 pm)  

    I honestly don't see how you could interpret it that way without a chip on your shoulder. And as it happens, a gap of more than 300 between first and second innings isn't especially common. It's the largest gap for Australia in that list in the last 50 years.

    By Blogger Geoff (30 Nov 2006, 9:59:00 pm)  


    We'd prefer if you posted comments with your real name to add more credibility to your opinions. However, the moderators reserve the right to delete comments, especially those containing offensive or unsuitable language. The opinions in the comments are your own views. You are welcome to provide a URL to your own cricket blog, but the moderators reserve the right to delete comments which only reference sites for viewing live streams.

    Post a Comment


    Links within entries open in a new window. Some of the links may now be broken/not take you to the expected report since the original content providers may have archived/removed the contents. Some of the sites linked may require registration/subscription.
    All opinions expressed are those of the authors alone. The authors' respective employers (past, present or future) are in no way connected to the opinions expressed here.
    All pictures, photographs used are copyrights of the original owners. We do not intend to infringe on any copyright. Pictures and photographs are used here to merely accentuate and enhance the content value to our readers.

    Powered by Blogger Locations of visitors to this page
    HOME
    RSS Feed - RSS Feed


    Contact us
    cricket24x7 at gmail dot com
    cricket24x7 at yahoo dot com

    How Cricket 24x7 started


    The squad
    Deja vu all over again - part IV
    Jaffer v Sobers
    Cricket and workplace personalities
    Steve Harmlesson
    No changes for the Aussies?
    Misfortunes Never Come Singly
    Outside off, left alone
    Down to two now
    Australia vs England - First Test - Day Five
    Were you expecting any better?



    RHS navbar photo source - Tc7

    Partnership between


    Creative Commons License
    Cricket 24x7 - All the cricket by V Ganesh & S Jagadish is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License.