Cricket 24x7 - All the cricket

Breaking/Brief news

    August 02, 2004



    Normally, a choker is an item of jewellery worn around the neck. However, with the Indian team's propensity to just not rise to the occassion when it is a cup final, etymologists across the globe are pondering adding in another meaning to the word 'choker'. I'm not saying this Indian team doesnt turn up when the occasion demands it. After all it has in the past demonstrated the ability to pull off victories from the jaws of defeat. But there seems to be some brain halt when it comes to finals. The triumph in the NatWest Series of 2002 is not enough to assuage the feelings of Indian cricket fan(atic)s.

    Yesterday's game was lost by the batsmen [and perhaps by the decision to leave Kumble out]. The bowlers did very well to keep Sri Lanka down to 228 after they were approximately 140/2 in 32 overs. The fact that scoring runs was going to be tough against a spin oriented bowling attack like Sri Lanka's must have been made blindingly obvious from the way Sehwag and Tendulkar were turning the ball, leave alone Harbhajan. Yet, India's batsmen chose a very cautious approach to the target and the 50 came up only in the 15th over. All it then took were a couple of wickets to set the cat amongst the pigeons.

    Mohammad Kaif's spot in the team must be something worth discussing. Yes, he saves 15-20 runs on the field. But as the #7 batsman [not a fielder-batsman mind you!], he is also supposed to make runs now and then. With Kaif, it is a "when it rains it pours" kind of situation. In the last 20 innings he has played, he has made 474 runs, 276 of them coming from four games. Clearly India is carrying a fielder who cannot make runs consistently. Yuvraj too can field. But he is far more consistent than Kaif. The argument that Kaif comes far too low down the order to make runs in bulk quantities is a stupid one. Why hasnt the management tried pushing him up the order as they did in the World Cup? He didnt do too badly then, did he?

    If he is in the side as a batsman, he must make runs. Simple. If he is only worth 20-25 runs per game (as a fielder only), then we're probably better off selecting someone who only saves 5-10 runs per game but can on a consistent basis score 25-30 runs, every time. Alternately we can just pick a specialist keeper who will definitely save more runs [and effect more runouts] than Dravid and score a few runs as well. A team which claims to be #2 in the world must not carry non-performers.
    Thus spake Jagadish @ 12:23 PM |
    Did you like the post? [ Subscribe to the blog feed - Blog Feed | | ]

    1 sledge(s):

    We lost because of the batsmen and NOT because of leaving Kumble out - Playing him would only have resulted in bigger margin of defeat as he would have bowled atleast 7-8 overs and would have given much more than Sehwag/Sachin and certainly wouldn't have picked up any wickets - you can argue that he would have picked up atleast one if you are a hardcore Kumble fan. KUMBLE IS USELESS FOR ODIs. Period.

    By Blogger Ganesh (03-Aug-2004, 8:41:00 AM)  


    We'd prefer if you posted comments with your real name to add more credibility to your opinions. However, the moderators reserve the right to delete comments, especially those containing offensive or unsuitable language. The opinions in the comments are your own views. You are welcome to provide a URL to your own cricket blog, but the moderators reserve the right to delete comments which only reference sites for viewing live streams.

    Post a Comment

    Links to

    Technorati

    Bloglines

    Blogger search:

    Create a Link


    Links within entries open in a new window. Some of the links may now be broken/not take you to the expected report since the original content providers may have archived/removed the contents. Some of the sites linked may require registration/subscription.
    All opinions expressed are those of the authors alone. The authors' respective employers (past, present or future) are in no way connected to the opinions expressed here.
    All pictures, photographs used are copyrights of the original owners. We do not intend to infringe on any copyright. Pictures and photographs are used here to merely accentuate and enhance the content value to our readers.

    Powered by Blogger Locations of visitors to this page
    HOME
    RSS Feed - RSS Feed


    Contact us
    cricket24x7 at gmail dot com
    cricket24x7 at yahoo dot com

    How Cricket 24x7 started


    The squad
    Abhijit Kale episode still has its own effects on ...
    Bob Woolmer just feels sorry for Sami's horror ove...
    The ICC confirmed that umpires would be wired up t...
    Did Pakistan choose not to exercise the option of ...
    Did you know that Sehwag is in second spot in term...
    Maurice Odumbe has slipped deeper into trouble aft...
    Shane Bond, easily one of the three quickest bowle...
    John Bracewell's post mortem of New Zealand's tour...
    Sarwan's childhood friend will be representing USA...
    Who's the only Test opener never to have been dism...



    RHS navbar photo source - Tc7

    Partnership between


    Creative Commons License
    Cricket 24x7 - All the cricket by V Ganesh & S Jagadish is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License.