Breaking/Brief news
September 27, 2006
Shastri on Indian woes
Ravi Shastri throws more light on his views after the Indian debacle at Kuala Lumpur and seems to have valid points like Irfan's batting burden affecting his bowling, no backups if our middle order keeps failing, fiddling Sehwag's batting position and some more.
Did you like the post? [ Subscribe to the blog feed -
| He's definitely right about Pathan's woes and Sehwag's batting order. However, as I've posted on my blog, I think he's horribly off the mark with his comments on experimentation in general and the relationship between Dravid and Chappell.
By 
Ayush Trivedi (27 Sept 2006, 8:41:00 pm)
I think Shastri's quite right in pointing out that Dravid continuing to open when Tendulkar was back, was rather unwarranted. Dravid's role in the team in the last 2-3 years has been as a "finisher". It's perhaps a little too late to groom Sehwag to do that!
By Jagadish (29 Sept 2006, 6:03:00 pm)
We'd prefer if you posted comments with your real name to add more credibility to your opinions. However, the moderators reserve the right to delete comments, especially those containing offensive or unsuitable language. The opinions in the comments are your own views. You are welcome to provide a URL to your own cricket blog, but the moderators reserve the right to delete comments which only reference sites for viewing live streams.
Links within entries open in a new window. Some of the links may now be broken/not take you to the expected report since the original content providers may have archived/removed the contents. Some of the sites linked may require registration/subscription.
All opinions expressed are those of the authors alone. The authors' respective employers (past, present or future) are in no way connected to the opinions expressed here.
All pictures, photographs used are copyrights of the original owners. We do not intend to infringe on any copyright. Pictures and photographs are used here to merely accentuate and enhance the content value to our readers.
|
|
|
|
Post a Comment