Cricket 24x7 - All the cricket

Breaking/Brief news

    March 04, 2006

    Are you Zimbabwe in disguise?

    I'm fairly sure the crowd at Newlands was chanting this today. Chasing South Africa's fairly good total of 289, Australia were all out for 93. Makhaya Ntini took 6/22. Australia were without Ricky Ponting and Andrew Symonds (and of course McGrath), but that is hardly any sort of excuse for such a defeat.

    It is the fourth lowest total in their proud history and the lowest total by a team not named Zimbabwe, Bangladesh or West Indies, since England were shot out for 88 by Sri Lanka in 2003.

    Mind you, this was the same side which lost at Cardiff to Bangladesh.

    I actually wanted to title this post 'Are you Bangladesh in disguise?', but then realized that Bangladesh did quite ok last week.

    Graeme Smith & co. sure are having some sweet revenge!
    Thus spake Jagadish @ 1:00 am |
    Did you like the post? [ Subscribe to the blog feed - Blog Feed | | ]

    4 sledge(s):

    weren't this the the team which had bench load of players who can any moment replace the senior guys and perform. This performance more or less gives credibility to sobers recent statement.

    By Anonymous Anonymous (4 Mar 2006, 12:40:00 pm)  

    anon: Hehe, I won't link up the two, but 93 all out is pathetic. Of course, Aus could come back to win 3-2!

    By Blogger Jagadish (5 Mar 2006, 9:07:00 am)  

    So the "statistic" you claiming is that this is the fourth lowest total, in just 3 years??

    Of all those quoted sides, and "Anonymous" criticising the Aussie "bench players" - how many came back to completely outplay the opposition just two days later!!

    Dream on...Australia will stay number one of a long time yet...

    By Anonymous Anonymous (6 Mar 2006, 4:05:00 am)  

    Ox: It was meant to be in good humour. No one questioned Australia's #1 spot. They lose so little, it is a shock when they do. But 93 all out is still pathetic. Australia's come back in game 3 merely reinforces the view that Ponting is like 5 times better than the rest of the Australian batsmen :) Mind you, I did say that it was likely that Aus would come back to win 3-2!

    By Blogger Jagadish (7 Mar 2006, 10:28:00 am)  


    We'd prefer if you posted comments with your real name to add more credibility to your opinions. However, the moderators reserve the right to delete comments, especially those containing offensive or unsuitable language. The opinions in the comments are your own views. You are welcome to provide a URL to your own cricket blog, but the moderators reserve the right to delete comments which only reference sites for viewing live streams.

    Post a Comment


    Links within entries open in a new window. Some of the links may now be broken/not take you to the expected report since the original content providers may have archived/removed the contents. Some of the sites linked may require registration/subscription.
    All opinions expressed are those of the authors alone. The authors' respective employers (past, present or future) are in no way connected to the opinions expressed here.
    All pictures, photographs used are copyrights of the original owners. We do not intend to infringe on any copyright. Pictures and photographs are used here to merely accentuate and enhance the content value to our readers.

    Powered by Blogger Locations of visitors to this page
    HOME
    RSS Feed - RSS Feed


    Contact us
    cricket24x7 at gmail dot com
    cricket24x7 at yahoo dot com

    How Cricket 24x7 started


    The squad
    Danger for Laxman and Harbhajan
    Totally unreal
    England all set to weaken one-day squad
    Double-click for thousand
    A truly refreshing sight
    The BCCI's convoluted thinking
    Glenn McGrath out of test cricket till end of the ...
    Lots of centuries coming up
    Half Time Scores: Collingwood's Rose Tinted Glasse...
    All last year's yesterdays?



    RHS navbar photo source - Tc7

    Partnership between


    Creative Commons License
    Cricket 24x7 - All the cricket by V Ganesh & S Jagadish is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License.