Cricket 24x7 - All the cricket

Breaking/Brief news

    August 16, 2010

    Spirit of cricket spoils Sehwag century?

    Predictably enough, Suraj Randiv's no-ball to Virender Sehwag, preventing Sehwag from reaching his century with a six, is making the news on the extremely vitriolic TV channels. Did he bowl it deliberately, to ensure that Sehwag didn't reach a well-deserved 100? Who cares?

    Sehwag changed his opinion from not taking it too seriously ("It happens in cricket. The other team doesn't want anybody to score a hundred against them. They tried their best. Doesn't matter to me, 99 or 100.") to claiming it was deliberate in the span of a few minutes.

    Besides, Sehwag did play out a couple of dot balls. So there's no real basis for him to whine.

    Is there anything in the rules that prevents a bowler from doing so? No! Even if it is there in the 'spirit of cricket', it means nothing. Captains and players have acted totally in violation of the spirit defined and no action has been taken.

    Did anything prevent India from declaring & setting Sri Lanka around 70 to win immediately after VVS Laxman got out in India's 2nd innings at Galle? There was charity being doled out to Murali in the form of his 800th wicket. VVS perhaps was trying to get the message across by getting run out? Why didn't any of the other batsmen get dismissed timed out, handling the ball, obstructing the field or hitting the ball twice?

    Labels: , , ,

    Thus spake Jagadish @ 11:14 pm |
    Did you like the post? [ Subscribe to the blog feed - Blog Feed | | ]

    16 sledge(s):

    There is the small matter of watching the replay of the ball bowled by Raniv for Sehwag to change his opinion. And when he first spoke he wasn't expecting such improper behavior from Randiv so he gave him the benefit of doubt. Moreover, it's not whining to point put someone's unsportsman behavior. Identifying it is important because players and umpires need to be careful with such people (when they ask for a runner and stuff like that..they can fake!).

    By Anonymous naveen (17-Aug-2010, 9:50:00 am)  

    I agree with naveen. Viru had every reason to change his opinion as Randiv's action was so f***ing cheap.

    On playing dot balls, its not that even Viru can hit a 6 of any delivery (just that he can do of many deliveries which others cant).

    And about the Galle incident, one of the Indian tailenders could have easily got run-out or hit-wicket and ensured Murali stayed on 799.

    I think this incident again reemphasizes that India are far from being cheap on the cricket field, whereas other nations do it more often.

    I am fairly sure Sanga was the one who instructed Randiv to do so and his reaction in the presentation was baffling and I am sorry Sanga, you have lost your respect in me.

    By Blogger Ganesh (17-Aug-2010, 10:42:00 am)  

    On the issue of Galle, why would any team do that. the idea of cricket is and should be to play without anybody's records in mind (even yours and your opponents). Murali finished at 800. Good for him. But that number should not be in the minds of Indians or sri Lankans. The fact that Randiv was thinking about Sehwag's 100 and voluntarily lost the match by gifting the run seems opposite to how you should play cricket. As a bowler all you should think about is can i get the batsman out, not if is on 99!

    By Anonymous naveen (17-Aug-2010, 11:07:00 am)  

    "Besides, Sehwag did play out a couple of dot balls. So there's no real basis for him to whine."

    Sehwag is not whining. He was asked by the press whether he felt it was deliberate and why he felt so. Being a straight-into-your-face-man that he is, he gave his reply. Some people who found it too blunt thought he was whining, which is not the case since he specifically stated that the win with a bonus point was far more important.

    And secondly, I guess Randiv had the idea of bowling that no-ball even before the two dot balls. He just didn't have the guts then! Just before he bowled 'that' no-ball, he had aborted his run-up midway through. So it seems pretty obvious that it was a deliberate act (not that one needed more reasons to prove it)!

    By Blogger Unknown (17-Aug-2010, 2:07:00 pm)  

    If Sehwag really doesn't care for individual numbers, this shouldn't even have been an issue.

    He can't say "my 100 doesn't matter compared to my team winning" and also accuse Randiv (or SL) of doing it deliberately.

    My point was that 'unsportsmanly' is a really stupid concept. Either its there in the laws, or its not. If players and teams were hauled up for acting outside the spirit of cricket, there'd hardly be any players or teams that weren't penalized.

    By Blogger Jagadish (17-Aug-2010, 4:09:00 pm)  


    I work with the Barmy Army and follow your blog. It's a really heated issue and I've seen many posts discussing it, however, if you are planning ahead to the Ashes then you only have 13 DAYS LEFT to win an amazing Barmy Army Experience of a lifetime at the Ashes in Australia this winter!!! Click here to enter NOW!!!!

    By Anonymous Hayley Barmy Army (17-Aug-2010, 6:16:00 pm)  

    There're 2 bits of delicious irony here.

    1. With a lot of clamour over changing the rule so that all runs scored off the final delivery where the game gets sealed are added to the batsman's score, it also implies that if Sehwag had tried to steal a quick single, and had been run-out of the Randiv no-ball, he would have been dismissed run out on 99 (joining a fairly elite bunch)

    2. Almost exactly 6 months ago, this happened at Eden Gardens:

    129.4 Tendulkar to Amla, 1 run, More drama! Sehwag kicks the ball away to the boundary! slightly short in length and outside off stump and Amla punched it off the back foot and the ball stops just near the boundary. Now the drama begins! Sehwag who was after the ball leans to kick it away over the boundary! The umpires get on walkie talkie and talk ,. And talk. ..

    At that stage, South Africa were 9 down, with 50+ more runs needed to make India bat again. India needed to win to become #1 in the ICC test rankings.

    I guess what Sehwag did was within the 'spirit of the game'! The spirit of the game is like the 'directive principles' in the Indian constitution. They are not enforceable.

    By Blogger Jagadish (17-Aug-2010, 11:54:00 pm)  

    Read my hub page about Englands chances of retaining the 2010-11 Ashes in Oz!

    By Blogger T.Banken (12-Oct-2010, 1:29:00 pm)  

    This was one big mess.

    Sri Lanka Cricket

    By Anonymous Sri Lanka Cricket (15-Oct-2010, 4:48:00 am)  

    who is the worlds best hitter?

    By Blogger N.S.N.Raju (15-Nov-2010, 10:02:00 pm)  

    Watch India vs New Zealand 5th Odi Live Streaming from MA Chidambaram Stadium, Chepauk, Chennai 10 December 2010 Match scheduled to begin at 14:30 local | 09:00 GMT. Online Cricket live streaming, Videos & Highlights. watch and

    By Blogger vinoth (10-Dec-2010, 1:05:00 pm)  

    Ashes 2010 live streaming, india VS south africa live match streaming

    ICC world cup 2011 live streaming

    By Blogger Author (13-Dec-2010, 3:53:00 pm)  

    This was indeed a needless and shameful one.

    By Anonymous (18-Jan-2011, 11:23:00 pm)  

    India vs South Africa Live Streaming, 2011 ICC cricket world cup 2011 29th cricket match of Group B will be played at Vidarbha Cricket Association Stadium, Jamtha, Nagpur, India on Saturday 12th March 2011. India vs South Africa Live match will start at 14:30 local time (09:00 GMT) and live streaming India time 2 PM

    By Blogger John Cornar (12-Mar-2011, 9:28:00 am)  

    I particularly think that the spirit of cricket does not spoil sehwag century, the other way around, I think it creates a motivation in the cricket fans towards the sehwag century

    By Anonymous pay per head trial (07-Mar-2013, 5:48:00 am)  

    Most valuable post! This article is very helpful and I think it quite fascinating while reading it. Looking forward to more post like this. Thanks for posting like this a good post.
    To service your laptop with offer prices, Please visit : Laptop service center in Navalur

    By Blogger Subhasree (29-Nov-2020, 5:39:00 pm)  

    We'd prefer if you posted comments with your real name to add more credibility to your opinions. However, the moderators reserve the right to delete comments, especially those containing offensive or unsuitable language. The opinions in the comments are your own views. You are welcome to provide a URL to your own cricket blog, but the moderators reserve the right to delete comments which only reference sites for viewing live streams.

    Post a Comment

    Links within entries open in a new window. Some of the links may now be broken/not take you to the expected report since the original content providers may have archived/removed the contents. Some of the sites linked may require registration/subscription.
    All opinions expressed are those of the authors alone. The authors' respective employers (past, present or future) are in no way connected to the opinions expressed here.
    All pictures, photographs used are copyrights of the original owners. We do not intend to infringe on any copyright. Pictures and photographs are used here to merely accentuate and enhance the content value to our readers.

    Powered by Blogger Locations of visitors to this page
    RSS Feed - RSS Feed

    Contact us
    cricket24x7 at gmail dot com
    cricket24x7 at yahoo dot com

    How Cricket 24x7 started

    The squad
    BCCI's planning for the 2011 World Cup
    If the law supposes that, then the law is a ass - ...
    Stop the gimmickry to save ODI cricket
    The BCCI's professionalism and the ICC's President...
    Twenty20 beats Tests and ODIs hollow
    A moronic run-out decision
    How the BCCI did nothing for three years about cri...
    The skeletons tumble out of the BCCI closet
    ICC and PCB - The 'unfathomables'
    Wanted for Indian cricket: Consistency of selectio...

    RHS navbar photo source - Tc7

    Partnership between

    Creative Commons License
    Cricket 24x7 - All the cricket by V Ganesh & S Jagadish is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License.