Cricket 24x7 - All the cricket

Breaking/Brief news

    October 30, 2006

    Completely on expected lines

    No, I’m not referring only to Steve Bucknor's appointment for yesterday's game, but also the actual way the much-hyped 'clash of the tournament' panned out.

    A target of 250 was never going to be a problem for Australia. While a lot was written and spoken about the bowlers having an off-day, the fact is that on a good batting surface, India needed to have at least two batsmen making big scores.

    Virender Sehwag and Rahul Dravid were both out without making the hundreds that they ought to have, once they’d settled in nicely. Sehwag’s dismissal for 65 was perhaps the turning point of the game, since it meant Dravid and Kaif would have to rebuild the innings, prevent a collapse and set the stage for Dhoni (the only one capable of making quick runs late in the innings in Yuvraj’s absence) to provide the impetus at the end of the innings.

    You can write all you want about the bowlers screwing up, but in my opinion, it was the batsmen who messed up.
    Thus spake Jagadish @ 11:02 am |
    Did you like the post? [ Subscribe to the blog feed - Blog Feed | | ]

    2 sledge(s):

    Thanks for the comment on my post. Here's what I think...

    While I agree that 249 wasn't a winning score against the Aussies, the general scoring trend in the series thus far and the form of the Indian batsmen meant that 249 was a score worth bowling at. And with Indian bowlers having acquitted themselves admirably well in the earlier games, one expected them to handle the situation better than they did! Given the pressures of a 'must-win' match, the batsmen held up better under the pressure than the bowlers.

    By Blogger Sameer (31 Oct 2006, 12:22:00 pm)  

    sameer: While the trend may have been lower scores, that was on wickets which were tougher to bat on. I didn't think that Mohali pitch had any real problems. Dravid and Sehwag were batting beautifully. If they'd hung around for 10 overs more, Australia would have been in serious trouble.

    By Blogger Jagadish (1 Nov 2006, 12:19:00 am)  


    We'd prefer if you posted comments with your real name to add more credibility to your opinions. However, the moderators reserve the right to delete comments, especially those containing offensive or unsuitable language. The opinions in the comments are your own views. You are welcome to provide a URL to your own cricket blog, but the moderators reserve the right to delete comments which only reference sites for viewing live streams.

    Post a Comment


    Links within entries open in a new window. Some of the links may now be broken/not take you to the expected report since the original content providers may have archived/removed the contents. Some of the sites linked may require registration/subscription.
    All opinions expressed are those of the authors alone. The authors' respective employers (past, present or future) are in no way connected to the opinions expressed here.
    All pictures, photographs used are copyrights of the original owners. We do not intend to infringe on any copyright. Pictures and photographs are used here to merely accentuate and enhance the content value to our readers.

    Powered by Blogger Locations of visitors to this page
    HOME
    RSS Feed - RSS Feed


    Contact us
    cricket24x7 at gmail dot com
    cricket24x7 at yahoo dot com

    How Cricket 24x7 started


    The squad
    Very promising stats
    Pakistan turning it on!
    Indian blues
    Quite beyond me
    ICC awards shortlist
    England improving
    ICC-BCCI partnership
    Life's a pitch
    We're waiting ...
    Boof's new role



    RHS navbar photo source - Tc7

    Partnership between


    Creative Commons License
    Cricket 24x7 - All the cricket by V Ganesh & S Jagadish is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License.