Cricket 24x7 - All the cricket

Breaking/Brief news

    July 03, 2006

    Super superstition helps India to historic series win

    I've now watched live India's winning moment at Headingley, Adelaide, Multan, Rawalpindi and Jamaica. No prizes for guessing who's been man of the match in four of those five tests.

    After a disastrous opening day, I then decided to turn to superstition. Like I mentioned in a post during India's tour to Pakistan, superstition has a huge part to play while watching cricket.

    On Saturday, I somehow chanced upon the formula. It was that I would not watch the game live for more than five minutes at a stretch. It worked like magic! West Indies folded up in barely two hours.

    Yesterday, the same formula was applied. In fact yesterday was the first time during the entire series, including one-dayers, that I saw the end of the day's play. I missed the action in the second session since I was trying to sleep, while at the same time visualizing if tomorrow's headline would read "Sarwan leads West Indies to victory" or "India win series". I was fairly sure end of play yesterday would also mean the end of the game. The target was small enough to be overhauled in a day given the likes of Gayle, Lara, Bravo and Chanderpaul would be batting.

    The winning moment, at around 4 am IST, made me immensely satisfied, especially since if the game hadn't ended yesterday, and if India were with a chance of sewing it up early in the day today, I'd have missed the moment since I'd neither be at home nor at the workplace.

    What about the Jamaica pitch? I find Brian Lara's comments difficult to accept. No one is suggesting it was the perfect test match wicket. At the same time, it wasn't the poor wicket that he makes it out to be. For his argument that the wicket helped India's spinners, he seems to forget that his side's quicks didn't do badly either - Taylor got 9/95 and Collymore got 7/65. If India's spinners got wickets, it was because they were two top quality ones; not because the pitch aided spin.

    In fact aside from maybe 3-4 dismissals (Lara's, Dravid's and Ganga's), there was nothing in the pitch which suggested that it was a terror and a minefield to bat on. If you had the ability and the patience, as Dravid (twice), Kumble (twice), Ganga and Ramdin showed, you could bat for a fair amount of time and get runs.

    I really do hope the ICC doesn't apply its pitch benchmarks and rule that Jamaica was a poor wicket.

    I know this is probably a post-facto justification, but I'd have maintained that the pitch was a good test match pitch even if the result had been different.


    Thus spake Jagadish @ 4:27 PM |
    Did you like the post? [ Subscribe to the blog feed - Blog Feed | | ]

    1 sledge(s):

    Yep...I didn't mention Lara in my analysis, but you're spot on. He whined a bit too much, I think. It was a bad pitch, but most of the costly damage was done by pacers, and his side had more (and supposedly better, and more experienced) than ours. His side had more experienced batsmen also, so what's the whole fuss of 'pitch was suiting Indians more'! Even he himself agreed that the bad pitch still did not justify their 100 odd collapse in first innings. And, in the end, wasn't that the whole difference between the two sides? The first innings runs.

    By Blogger worma (03-Jul-2006, 6:15:00 PM)  

    We'd prefer if you posted comments with your real name to add more credibility to your opinions. However, the moderators reserve the right to delete comments, especially those containing offensive or unsuitable language. The opinions in the comments are your own views. You are welcome to provide a URL to your own cricket blog, but the moderators reserve the right to delete comments which only reference sites for viewing live streams.

    Post a Comment

    Links to Super superstition helps India to historic series win



    Blogger search:

    Create a Link

    Links within entries open in a new window. Some of the links may now be broken/not take you to the expected report since the original content providers may have archived/removed the contents. Some of the sites linked may require registration/subscription.
    All opinions expressed are those of the authors alone. The authors' respective employers (past, present or future) are in no way connected to the opinions expressed here.
    All pictures, photographs used are copyrights of the original owners. We do not intend to infringe on any copyright. Pictures and photographs are used here to merely accentuate and enhance the content value to our readers.

    Powered by Blogger Locations of visitors to this page
    RSS Feed - RSS Feed

    Contact us
    cricket24x7 at gmail dot com
    cricket24x7 at yahoo dot com

    How Cricket 24x7 started

    The squad
    Game Set Match and Goal
    A Beeb mistake?
    32 and retired?
    Every day a Shivratri
    Kumble two short
    Rahul Dravid marches on
    Why didn't we win?
    Making excuses
    Sobers' record safe
    Another hat-trick for Harbhajan!

    RHS navbar photo source - Tc7

    Partnership between

    Creative Commons License
    Cricket 24x7 - All the cricket by V Ganesh & S Jagadish is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License.