Cricket 24x7 - All the cricket

Breaking/Brief news

    May 26, 2006

    The Ajit Agarkar debate

    The non-selection of Ajit Agarkar for the test squad explained here (emphasis mine)
    Sources at the meeting say that selectors went beyond the figures when deciding on Agarkar’s fate. ‘‘He might have taken wickets but hasn’t really run through a side. It’s not like stumps were flying or anything. He is a much-improved one-day bowler and that’s it,’’ he said.
    As many here would know, I personally don't think the Agarkar gamble is worth taking in tests, despite acknowledging (before many others) that he's been our *best* bowler for atleast past 5 ODIs. The reason, as the 'source' here says, is that I also feel he's just become a better ODI bowler, but still does not invoke the feeling of being a great striker in test matches, mainly due to the new restrictive style he's taken up. Sure it may (and will) work against compulsive strikers like Gayle, but not sure if he's our best bet for running through this strong (especially at home) WI batting lineup, and especially after first session/day of a match. There's a similar example given in the same article
    There is certainly some justification in the selectors’ thinking when one considers the recent Sri Lanka series at home. After being the highest wicket-taker in the ODI series — he claimed 12 wickets in six games — Agarkar had just three wickets from the subsequent three Tests.
    That makes one doubt the test utility of Agarkar, especially in non-friendly conditions. I would surely have been disappointed had this series been played in e.g. England or South Africa (where we do go later this year, and if he retains his form, I would like to see him play the test series)

    That said, he still has two matches to knock the proverbial selectorial doors down with his performance. 5-6 more wkts, at a similar economy rate, may still see his name being tick-marked for staying back, is what I feel.
    Thus spake worma @ 1:12 PM |
    Did you like the post? [ Subscribe to the blog feed - Blog Feed | | ]

    2 sledge(s):

    I dont prefer classifying as just players into category of cricket viz One-Day/Test.
    The proof is once dumped as just a test player, Rahul Dravid is now perhaps the best Indian batsmen in any form of the game in terms of scores and consistency of scores.The ICC trophies he won last year is a proof of this fact.
    I thought performance was the criteria to get into a team.

    By Blogger The Light-House. (27-May-2006, 4:12:00 PM)  

    tarun: I disagree. Some folks are much more suited to certain forms of the game. I'd never get Wasim Jaffer to play in a one-dayer. I'd never have picked Ajay Jadeja or Robin Singh to play in a test. The good ones do well in both forms. Agarkar has done nothing in his test career (aside from Adelaide and Lord's) to suggest he is worth investing in as far as test cricket is concerned. Dravid didn't become a good one-day player overnight. He re-invented his batting, approach to the game as well volunteering to play as a keeper.

    By Blogger Jagadish (29-May-2006, 2:02:00 PM)  


    We'd prefer if you posted comments with your real name to add more credibility to your opinions. However, the moderators reserve the right to delete comments, especially those containing offensive or unsuitable language. The opinions in the comments are your own views. You are welcome to provide a URL to your own cricket blog, but the moderators reserve the right to delete comments which only reference sites for viewing live streams.

    Post a Comment

    Links to The Ajit Agarkar debate

    Technorati

    Bloglines

    Blogger search:

    Create a Link


    Links within entries open in a new window. Some of the links may now be broken/not take you to the expected report since the original content providers may have archived/removed the contents. Some of the sites linked may require registration/subscription.
    All opinions expressed are those of the authors alone. The authors' respective employers (past, present or future) are in no way connected to the opinions expressed here.
    All pictures, photographs used are copyrights of the original owners. We do not intend to infringe on any copyright. Pictures and photographs are used here to merely accentuate and enhance the content value to our readers.

    Powered by Blogger Locations of visitors to this page
    HOME
    RSS Feed - RSS Feed


    Contact us
    cricket24x7 at gmail dot com
    cricket24x7 at yahoo dot com

    How Cricket 24x7 started


    The squad
    Harsha on the Indian options
    Have a laugh!
    Test Squad for WI tour
    Notes on an Indian loss
    Angus Fraser has lost his marbles
    Well done, Thanks a lot and now we want the old Ka...
    Forty rounds
    Tendulkar out, who'll be in?
    Another yorker from Harsha
    When is a surprise no longer a surprise?



    RHS navbar photo source - Tc7

    Partnership between


    Creative Commons License
    Cricket 24x7 - All the cricket by V Ganesh & S Jagadish is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License.