Breaking/Brief news
November 12, 2004
Mukul Kesavan writes in Wisden Asia Cricket that Gilchrist, Yuvraj, Kasprowicz or Gillespie's walkathons in the recent series merely corroborated what was plainly obvious from the camera - that they nicked the ball and the catch was clean. As we've mentioned in these columns earlier, all the walking was done when it was blindingly obviously out. I didnt see a single instance of an Australian batsman who shall not be pointed out by name, (except for the hint that he has big ears and a second name starting with 'G'), walk when it was a borderline decision.
Labels: walking
Did you like the post? [ Subscribe to the blog feed -
|
We'd prefer if you posted comments with your real name to add more credibility to your opinions. However, the moderators reserve the right to delete comments, especially those containing offensive or unsuitable language. The opinions in the comments are your own views. You are welcome to provide a URL to your own cricket blog, but the moderators reserve the right to delete comments which only reference sites for viewing live streams.
Links within entries open in a new window. Some of the links may now be broken/not take you to the expected report since the original content providers may have archived/removed the contents. Some of the sites linked may require registration/subscription.
All opinions expressed are those of the authors alone. The authors' respective employers (past, present or future) are in no way connected to the opinions expressed here.
All pictures, photographs used are copyrights of the original owners. We do not intend to infringe on any copyright. Pictures and photographs are used here to merely accentuate and enhance the content value to our readers.
|
|
|
|
Post a Comment