ICC Champions Trophy in Sep-Oct 2009, but where?
At the ICC Board meeting, there were quite a few decisions which would have a short-term and long-term impact on the game.On the first day
, the ICC decided that the BCCI would meet representatives from the Indian Cricket League. This was a result of the ICL folks meeting ICC President David Morgan
a couple of weeks ago. The ICC is no doubt serious about a rapprochement with the ICL after the way several Bangladesh players signed up for the ICL
It is in the interest of cricket players and administrators that the BCCI and the ICL arrive at a solution in a reasonable timeframe. While I hope that it can be sorted out by the end of the year, I don't think things will move that fast. The ICL's new season
has just started. Zee has invested far too much in the venture to agree to an abrupt end. My guess is that over the next year, negotiations will result in the ICL disbanding and players being allowed to first represent their domestic teams and then a year or so after that, become eligible to be picked for national duty. Will it result in the likes of some obviously talented blokes like Rayudu, Jhunjhunwala, TP Singh, Sathish or Shalabh Srivastava
getting picked, or will the youngsters who've played in BCCI authorized tournaments be given priority?
The umpire decision review system will be trialled in four more important series (NZ v WI, Ind v Pak, WI v Eng & RSA v Aus) over the next 6 months. That's a good idea, except that the system as it existed in Sri Lanka should be fine tuned a little bit
and then trialled. There are some obvious flaws, and it doesn't make sense to persist with them when series are at stake. In addition, I wonder why the ICC didn't think of trialling the system in ODIs and T20 games. After all, in those shorter forms, the chance of a wrong umpiring decision having an irreversible impact on the result of the match is so much higher.
In order to target having cricket included in the 2020 Olympic Games (venue to be decided in 2013), there would be further research done. It is worth noting that cricket wasn't included in the 2006 Doha Asian Games
, but will be included at Guangzhou in 2010
. The list of events for the 2014 Incheon Asian Games
is not yet published. Cricket wasn't part of the agenda at the 2006 Commonwealth Games in Melbourne
. Even more farcically, it isn't part of the 2010 Commonwealth Games in New Delhi
because in 2005, the BCCI decided that it wasn't in favour of Twenty20
being included at the games. Was that a missed moment or what?!
The ICC Future Tours Programme
is all set to be disbanded with effect from May 2012, as if anyone cares about it anymore!On the second day
, the ICC decided that the 2008 ICC Champions Trophy, which had been moved to 2009 a couple of months ago
, would be held between September and October 2009. However, it would only last 12 days and would be held in one city (as against 17 days and 2 cities). The final decision on if the event would be held in Pakistan would be made after India's tour of Pakistan in early 2009.
So let's see how this could go. In Feb 2009, after India's tour, the ICC could decide that it was safe enough to conduct the tournament in Pakistan. But there would still be 7-8 more months to go before the start of the event. Countries could develop cold feet in that time gap, for real and imaginary reasons. So what would the ICC do then? The best option would have been to move the
next edition out of Pakistan, perhaps to West Indies (the 2010 hosts) and allot the 2010 event to Pakistan. By 2010, the concept of the ICC Champions Trophy would be gone anyway!
Labels: 2009 champions trophy, champions trophy, icc, indian cricket league, olympics, reviews, twenty20