Cricket 24x7 - All the cricket

Breaking/Brief news

    July 18, 2008

    A clear-cut case of 'restraint of trade'

    The cheap fight between the BCCI and the Indian Cricket League has now plunged to new depths.

    The BCCI today announced that India's contracted players would not be allowed to play in the English domestic season if the side they were representing had ICL players in it.

    The ECB had initially followed the BCCI's diktat and banned ICL players from playing in the English domestic season. But just over 2 months ago, three South African players won an appeal and they were ruled eligible to play for their counties. The ECB's requirement was that players' home national cricket boards provide permission in the form of a 'No Objection Certificate'. Andrew Hall, Justin Kemp & Johan van der Wath did not get the NOC and were not allowed to register.

    In the case that Kerry Packer filed against the ICC and TCCB in 1977, Justice Slade ruled in favour of Kerry Packer & his motley crew. He said "A professional cricketer needs to make his living as much as any other professional man."

    In the light of that judgement, it seems to me that preventing Piyush Chawla, Ajit Agarkar and VVS Laxman from playing for county sides just because those sides have ICL players in them is a clear-cut case of 'restraint of trade'. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights says (Article 23) "Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment."

    I really hope someone forces the BCCI to quit the hallucination drugs and get back to reality. Today, cricketers are stopped from playing for other teams because those teams have ICL players. Tomorrow, will they be asked to stop staying in touch with those friends who've played in the ICL? After that, will the records of the ICL players be deleted?

    If you do have an opinion, leave a comment and also vote in the poll.

    Labels: , , , ,


    Thus spake Jagadish @ 12:29 am |
    Did you like the post? [ Subscribe to the blog feed - Blog Feed | | ]

    3 sledge(s):

    Hello,

    Nice posts.. I had a question on the net run rate posting of yours. In case of a walkover given by a team, can you tell me how the net run rate should be calculated?

    Thanks
    RR

    By Blogger Raja (20-Jul-2008 12:44:00 am)  

    Raja

    I think you are referring to this post - http://cricket24x7.blogspot.com/2007/03/time-to-review-net-run-rate-rule.html

    Remember that team's cant declare their innings in limited overs games. They can concede a game though (which is what you refer to as a walkover?). In that situation, their run rate should be calculated as total runs scored / maximum allotted overs, i.e. similar to that of an innings where the team was dismissed before the 50 (or whatever the limit was) overs were completed.

    By Blogger Jagadish (23-Jul-2008 2:21:00 pm)  

    Nice blog..

    Check mine too

    www.sanath189.blogspot.com

    www.mysterymendis.blogspot.com

    By Blogger Sujan Rao (sanath189) (18-Sep-2008 12:22:00 pm)  


    We'd prefer if you posted comments with your real name to add more credibility to your opinions. However, the moderators reserve the right to delete comments, especially those containing offensive or unsuitable language. The opinions in the comments are your own views. You are welcome to provide a URL to your own cricket blog, but the moderators reserve the right to delete comments which only reference sites for viewing live streams.

    Post a Comment

    Links to A clear-cut case of 'restraint of trade'

    Technorati

    Bloglines

    Blogger search:

    Create a Link


    Links within entries open in a new window. Some of the links may now be broken/not take you to the expected report since the original content providers may have archived/removed the contents. Some of the sites linked may require registration/subscription.
    All opinions expressed are those of the authors alone. The authors' respective employers (past, present or future) are in no way connected to the opinions expressed here.
    All pictures, photographs used are copyrights of the original owners. We do not intend to infringe on any copyright. Pictures and photographs are used here to merely accentuate and enhance the content value to our readers.

    Powered by Blogger Locations of visitors to this page
    HOME
    RSS Feed - RSS Feed


    Contact us
    cricket24x7 at gmail dot com
    cricket24x7 at yahoo dot com

    How Cricket 24x7 started


    The squad
    Proposed schedule for England tour of North, West,...
    IPL doping controversy
    South Africa suffer from Lord's curse
    Squad announcements: India's tour to Sri Lanka & C...
    Zimbabwe throw Twenty20 World Cup scheduling haywi...
    Bvute & Chingoka are right, let's focus on the cri...
    Time for a reality check and some common sense
    More torture for ODI cricket watchers
    ODI cricket digs its own grave
    Kevin Pietersen could end up changing the rules



    RHS navbar photo source - Tc7

    Partnership between


    Creative Commons License
    Cricket 24x7 - All the cricket by V Ganesh & S Jagadish is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License.