Breaking/Brief news
October 18, 2004
With the third test at Nagpur starting more than a week later, the scheduling by the BCCI has to be questioned yet again. Ganesh had bemoaned at the allocation of grounds for this series after India lost at Bangalore. Why is there a week's gap between two tests, unless there is an unannounced tour game still to be played? Why are we playing good hosts by allowing Australia to recover from various injuries, niggles, heat-strokes etc? Wouldnt we ideally want Gillespie to be carrying an injury into the Nagpur game, which would start 3 days after Madras, only to breakdown midway through the game? Then again, the scheduling may end up benefitting India since Tendulkar may become fit for Nagpur!
Labels: aus v ind 2004
Did you like the post? [ Subscribe to the blog feed -
|
We'd prefer if you posted comments with your real name to add more credibility to your opinions. However, the moderators reserve the right to delete comments, especially those containing offensive or unsuitable language. The opinions in the comments are your own views. You are welcome to provide a URL to your own cricket blog, but the moderators reserve the right to delete comments which only reference sites for viewing live streams.
Links within entries open in a new window. Some of the links may now be broken/not take you to the expected report since the original content providers may have archived/removed the contents. Some of the sites linked may require registration/subscription.
All opinions expressed are those of the authors alone. The authors' respective employers (past, present or future) are in no way connected to the opinions expressed here.
All pictures, photographs used are copyrights of the original owners. We do not intend to infringe on any copyright. Pictures and photographs are used here to merely accentuate and enhance the content value to our readers.
|
|
|
|
Post a Comment