Breaking/Brief news
July 18, 2004
ICC president Ehsan Mani is not happy about a TV channel using Azharuddin as its special commentator. Bizarrely though, when the ICC never objected to attempts by Cronje to ensure that he could earn a living by doing commentary or coaching or something related to cricket or a statement by the then UCB President Percy Sonn that while Cronje was banned from UCB related activities, there was always the possibility of rehabiliting him in future. Even more farcically, the ICC had a meek 'The two cases are not related' reply when questioned about how the ACB allowed Shane Warne to carry on with commentary while he was banned at the start of the 2003 World Cup. Perhaps it is another case of differential (or preferential) treatment?
Labels: match fixing
Did you like the post? [ Subscribe to the blog feed -
|
We'd prefer if you posted comments with your real name to add more credibility to your opinions. However, the moderators reserve the right to delete comments, especially those containing offensive or unsuitable language. The opinions in the comments are your own views. You are welcome to provide a URL to your own cricket blog, but the moderators reserve the right to delete comments which only reference sites for viewing live streams.
Links within entries open in a new window. Some of the links may now be broken/not take you to the expected report since the original content providers may have archived/removed the contents. Some of the sites linked may require registration/subscription.
All opinions expressed are those of the authors alone. The authors' respective employers (past, present or future) are in no way connected to the opinions expressed here.
All pictures, photographs used are copyrights of the original owners. We do not intend to infringe on any copyright. Pictures and photographs are used here to merely accentuate and enhance the content value to our readers.
|
|
|
|
Post a Comment